bob

The Trade

 

When the Toronto Maple Leafs make a trade, especially one involving seven players, those of us in the media feel compelled to address it. Add me to that list, with some reluctance.

The swap between the Leafs and Flames this past weekend, while sizable in quantity, is of questionable quality. As a result, I find it difficult to muster an energetic opinion on its merit.

Don't get me wrong, it was a deal that both teams felt compelled to make and their reasoning is understandable. The Leafs have proven themselves to be so completely inept that Brian Burke could have concocted almost any combination of players and been met with acceptance from his fan base. Burke saw what everyone else saw…a team which had become proficient only in finding new ways to lose and whose tangible assets numbered no more than three. Kessel, Kaberle and Schenn are commodities which Burke would deem untradable or which would demand a significant return. The rest are no more than loose pieces which no longer fit the puzzle.

Calgary's perspective was different. A team of which much was expected, the Flames had been in free-fall for weeks and required a jolt in order to get their hearts restarted. As often happens in sports, this appears to be "a deal for the sake of a deal."

In Stajan and Hagman they acquired two of the Leafs top four scorers and maybe that will prove helpful. Then again, Leaf fans have seen enough of these players to be dubious. Jamal Mayers was and is irrelevant. But in Ian White they are getting a player who is at least useful and perhaps an emerging talent.

As for Toronto, the gem in the deal was obviously Dion Phaneuf. As recently as two years ago, acquiring him would have been impossible. In 2008 he was finalist for the Norris Trophy and generally viewed as the best young defenseman in the game. Nineteen months later he is dispatched to the Siberia of the NHL (okay, Edmonton may have a claim to that title) for a pack of middle-of-the-road workers. Phaneuf has talent…plenty of talent…but he also has flaws, in his play and perhaps his character. Were it not so, he would still be a Flame today.

What Burke is betting is that moving to Toronto will bring out his "A" game. What Leaf fans, who have watched their team for longer than B.B., can attest is that it rarely works out that way. The list of players who have regressed after landing in The Big Smoke is very, very, very long. If Phaneuf finds himself in Toronto, he will join a list who have achieved this distinction and that one is very, very, very short.

Posted by: bob on Feb 2, 2010
 
Comments Add a Comment
Anonymous Comment

sylvestb wrote on Feb 7, 2010

What happened to the podcast on iTunes?
Report this Comment
Anonymous Comment

Cobra289 wrote on Feb 5, 2010

TopCat, you are right on the mark vis-a-vis Burke. Toronto has had some really incompetent GM's over the years but this guy takes the prize. He has been in Toronto for 15 months and look at the team. A bunch of overpaid, underachieving prima donnas, and more to follow. Oh yeah, I can hear the moans and cries, give Burke a chance...he hasn't been here long enough. Bet you a bundle you will be singing the same song 5 years from now. And as for the bozos at MSLE Head Office, don't get me started. Why the supporters of the team don't rebel is beyond me. Particularly when you compare the Leafs with Pittsburg. Wasn't long ago (at least not 43 years) that the Penguins were the worst team in the NHL. If you dyed-in-the-wool Toronto fans would pull your head out of your a**holes, you would see the scam for what it is. Lots of money for the suits!!!
Report this Comment
Anonymous Comment

Chris wrote on Feb 4, 2010

Topcat: That's why I say, at worst, JS is better than Toskala or Gustavsson. At his best, he contends for a Vezina trophy. So the upside is huge. Same with Phaneuf: huge upside. Clearly there's lots more wheeling and dealing to come. Should be interesting. :)
Report this Comment
ToX

ToX wrote on Feb 4, 2010

As long as the Teacher's Union owns this team, there will NEVER be a cup in Toronto. Period.
Report this Comment
Anonymous Comment

Topcat wrote on Feb 4, 2010

Well I see his "strategy" is to overpay for marginal upgrades and cover it all up with award-winning interviews. He might have been the GM we needed 10 years ago, when we could have bought some decent players - ie -before the cap. Being the richest franchise in the league is a 0 advantage with the cap - you cant even overspend a la NY Yankees and pay a penalty. Burkie's Blunders have doomed us to mediocrity for years to come. Then again, mediocrity IS a step up from where he has put this team today. I cant imagine that people in TO are going to live their entire lives without ever seeing this team win a cup - its laughable, sad as well, but laughable.
Report this Comment
Anonymous Comment

Take Dead Aim wrote on Feb 3, 2010

I get the point of Bob's article. But Burke has been different from most of the GMs that we've had to suffer through in this city. Can anyone name the management philosophy of the past GMs we've had? Sure, we can guess at a couple (draft, schmaft). but for the most part, their strategy (the team they've specifically wanted to build) has been mostly a mystery. Now, i'm not saying tha Burke's idea of a gritty, physical team is the way to the promise land. On the contrary, that kind of team hasn't won a championship in some time, and certainly not since the recent rule changes that reduced alot of the stuff these teams depend on for success. But at least there's an ACTUAL STRATEGY now. And he's clearly adhering to it. Short of a championship, that in and of itself is enough of a change for someone that has watched this team and has been at an absolute loss as to what was going through the minds of the front office braintrust.
Report this Comment
Anonymous Comment

Carloskie wrote on Feb 3, 2010

As Cliffie Fletcher might say "Pheneuf Schemeuf". Leafaholics might phanticize about THE trade but the fact remains that Burke has traded away any chance of realistically building this team by trading away its future. Virtually assured of capturing one of the top 3 junior prospects in each of the next 2 drafts, he gave it away for a player (Kessel)who is a luxury add-on to a contender, not a building block for a pretender. Burke can fantasize, theorize,hypothesize and proseletize but he can't upsize this moribund bunch by trading draft picks. He has fallen into the trap laid posthumously by the crafty H. Ballard; T. Hall or T. Seguin or C. Fowler will be reminders of what could-have-been when Boston visits TO next season.
Report this Comment
ToX

ToX wrote on Feb 3, 2010

TY MONTY: What particular year would you be talking about? You can't possibly mean this year??
Report this Comment
Anonymous Comment

Topcat wrote on Feb 3, 2010

Chris - Luongo is living proof that a goalie alone gets you nowhere. And the current JS is no Luongo but in salary only - Leaf fans can only hope he regains most of his past form. Yes he is going to be the key to how they do next year - but he is an UFA then and will certainly be in for a pay drop. And playing behind this team, he too will probably want out - so hopefully enjoy him next year - but if this team doesnt get some PK, skilled forwards, and some heart, it will be same old, same old. Where is the Leafs that Burke promised long ago? Tough to play against - truculent - winning? All I see is dumb, unskilled, heartless, and ***s. Oh, and more expensive at that. A hot JS is the key for Leaf fans maybe forgetting about Burkie's Blunders to date, but this team is years away from even competing with the top 8. They got no stars in the system and no top picks to boot, so how bright can the future be?
Report this Comment
Anonymous Comment

Ty Monty wrote on Feb 3, 2010

I think JS and Dion will get us to the playoffs!
Report this Comment
Anonymous Comment

Chris wrote on Feb 3, 2010

It all starts in goal. JS on his worst day is better than Toskala or Gustavsson. A great goalie is more valuable than a great defenceman. You need six great defenders to try and compensate for one lousy goalie. You only need one great goalie to compensate for six lousy defenders. (Slight exaggeration but you get the point.) The goalie is the only guy that plays 60 minutes. He has the greatest impact on the teams success or failure.
Report this Comment
Anonymous Comment

ToX wrote on Feb 3, 2010

There's about a snowball's chance in hell of Boston giving up that #1 pick, maybe Boston's own #1 pick, but not the one's aquired for Kessel. Toronto had the chance as you stated, straight up and that ship has left the harbour.
Report this Comment
Anonymous Comment

Topcat wrote on Feb 3, 2010

JS is still a good goalie, but will he be able to find that old spark behind this team of ***s? Remember, he is being paid Luongo-type money and eats up a big pile of the cake. On the other hand, the contracts offered by this "new" regime to Van Ryn, Finger, Exelby, Komisarek, etc didnt accomplish anything at all to solve the apparent defensive woes the Leafs had, so why not take a shot with Giggy? It seems everyone else these guys overpay for isnt doing the trick, so JS is worth a shot obviously. Now if we can just trade Kaberle to Boston for that first round pick back ..... To think that it was Kabs for Phil even up at one time should bring Leaf fans to tears for what Burke actually ended up paying for him. Getting the first rounder back will at least soften the blow...
Report this Comment
Anonymous Comment

ToX wrote on Feb 3, 2010

I can't believe that Philly didn't pick up on Jiggy.......
Report this Comment
YukonSloMo

YukonSloMo wrote on Feb 3, 2010

I have to agree with my esteemed colleagues...Giguire could be the goalie the Lifeless Leafers have searched for....Nothing worse than having pride hurt....and it appears the Quackers were going a different way...That being said...He might play hungry again...Hungry goalies work hard...and much like Dion...the city will embrace him....All things considered not a bad for first game eh?? And I dont even like the Leafers....at all....
Report this Comment
paul

paul wrote on Feb 2, 2010

Giguere could be the steal of a lifetime. How many times has a goalie been written off in his career only to bounce back and play lights out for a few more years? Ed Belfour is a great example of that, Jose Theodore is sorta doing that now in Washington. I'm not saying for sure that its going to happen, but I wouldn't be so quick to write off the guy.
Report this Comment
Anonymous Comment

Chris wrote on Feb 2, 2010

Holy wow has everyone missed the boat on GIGUERE!!! *Technically* you could argue that HE is the best player in these deals based on his history. I think you guys are going to be blown away a year from now when Giguere turns out to be the most valuable player in these two trades and is carrying the team on his back. Look at his numbers! I can't believe a goalie that good would just fall off the face of the earth. He had a few bad seasons (apparently from injuries). His save % before that? .922, .918, .911, .914, .920, .920, .911. I'm absolutely SHOCKED that nobody besides me and Burke see what the Leafs have acquired here. (Again, for absolutely NOTHING.) They got an all-star goalie in exchange for deadwood. Wow.
Report this Comment
Anonymous Comment

Steve wrote on Feb 2, 2010

TTQ, while the will to win is an admirable quality to have, but every professional athlete has that virtue. However, what is abundantly lacking on the Maple Leafs or on franchise down on its luck is skilled athletes and quality coaching. While the 'beat them in the alley'grit and determination for less accomplished teams is a pre-requisite to succeed against more skilful teams, at the end of the day you need to have the horses in order to win.
Report this Comment
YukonSloMo

YukonSloMo wrote on Feb 2, 2010

Dion is 24 years of age....he has many distractions and probably had the weight of the world on his shoulders...The kid...cuz that is really what he is...apparently wore out his welcome in Calgary...so what? His upside made this trade impossible NOT to make. And yes the Leafs did give give up alot...but did they really...I dont see an outpouring of tears for any of the guys who left. Yes Dion has some growing up to do...and yes he probably has tried to hard to be many things rather than recognizing he is but a piece to a very large puzzle. His role on this team will be to lead he will be forced into being a leader...which is a big difference than his role in Calgary...I have little doubt he will rise to the occasion....but after all its still the lifeless Leafs...
Report this Comment
TTQ

TTQ wrote on Feb 2, 2010

Bobcat, the process of rebuilding the Leafs will not be an easy one. Burke has addressed many of the deficiencies within the Leafs team in one foul swoop and I think Ron Wilson eluded to it yesterday after practise when he said Phaneuf walked into the Leafs dressing room with some swagger. Also, the first thing out of Phaneuf's mouth was he wants to win hockey games. The Leafs have lacked leadership, character, and the will to win games which is an intangible in today's NHL that is too often overlooked. Many teams in todays Nhl have gone from the penthouse to the outhouse in one season...look at Boston last season going from a non-contender the season before to Cup contenders last year and Carolina is a good example of being Cup contenders to cellar-dwellers this year. The talent is spread so thin throughout the league that one or two solid additions and right mix of role players can put a team into contention. I think Burke realizes that and the team character must change on the Leafs
Report this Comment
Anonymous Comment

Topcat wrote on Feb 2, 2010

I dont really see how we can judge Phaneuf one way or the other - he comes in here being the best player on this team. He can "refind" his A game - but he will still be the best player on this team whether he finds it or not, unless further deals are made to add an even better player. This wont happen - and I would trade Schenn in a heartbeat for the right player\picks. He has progressed little if any this year and looks lost out there far too often. Burke promised truculence, and he is delivering on truculence. All he needs to deliver on now is turning this truculence into something other than a terrible hockey club, which coincidentally, just happens to be his job. The guy is proving just how over-rated he was in the past. The only great show Burke provides is his award-winning interviews, not the terrible hockey teams he has put on the ice so far.
Report this Comment
Anonymous Comment

Bob wrote on Feb 2, 2010

Bring back MacLean! Leafs receievd a top defenceman, hope he can score. What they gave up is replaceable in the free agent market, they still dont have a core group of young players coming up. Maybe Kessel( Ingie Hammerstrom) will get a better understanding from Phenulf on why you wear shoulder pads. Man Burk talks about having a physical team, someone neeeds to tell Phil.
Report this Comment