gibsonjeremy

Further Validation for Anthopoulos

 

This afternoon Major League Baseball (via mlb.com) officially released its list of the Top 50 Prospects in baseball. One glance at the list will give Blue Jays fans even further proof that new GM Alex Anthopoulos knows exactly what he is doing at the helm of the club.

Faced with a nearly impossible situation regarding Roy Halladay when he took over, Anthopoulos was able to insulate himself from media distraction and complete the blockbuster trade that will hopefully set the Jays on the right course moving forward. While many hated that Halladay was traded in the first place, he was going to leave after next season regardless. It came down to whether Anthopoulos could maximize the return package for his ace, and judging by the Prospects list it looks like he might have.

The top names on the list are of no surprise to baseball fans. Jason Heyward (Atlanta, #1), Stephen Strasburg (Washington, #2), Buster Posey (San Francisco, #4), and Desmond Jennings (Tampa Bay, #6) have been mentioned on several analytical and fantasy baseball sites for a long time. A few players, such as Brian Matusz (Baltimore, #5) and Neftali Feliz (Texas, #7) have already made an impact on the major leagues, turning in a few dominating performances last season. But in looking at the rest of the Top 50, one thing would have been missing had Anthopoulos not made the Halladay deal – Toronto Blue Jays.

For a team whose new philosophy is building through the draft and through the minor league system with youth, having zero of the Top 50 prospects in baseball is both embarrassing and unacceptable. But after the series of trades that sent Halladay to the Phillies, Toronto now has a system buoyed by pitcher Kyle Drabek (#17 on the list) and 1B/3B Brett Wallace (#16). Either one (or both) of those prospects could be seen in Toronto as early as this summer. Adding them to a current core of Ricky Romero, Adam Lind, Aaron Hill, and Travis Snider at least gives Toronto a solid foundation, something they didn't seem to have as early as last season.

In reality, projecting prospects in baseball is a crapshoot. So many variables go into the successful grooming of a major league star that the "experts" are often wrong (ask Todd Van Poppel). But ten times out of ten, I would rather risk having a top prospect fail than never having a top prospect at all. It's nice to finally have a GM who thinks the same way.

Posted by: gibsonjeremy on Jan 28, 2010
 
Comments Add a Comment
Anonymous Comment

Topcat wrote on Feb 4, 2010

Listen, anyone who thinks AA is any better than JP ought to think of one thing - why in heck are WE paying part of Halladays salary when he is already a steal at 17 per? Huh? How? Absurd, ridiculous, and a job done by an inexperienced and ineffective GM is how. The fact somehow that this impresses some people is laughable. We didnt get value back for Roy, and pitched in $$$ on top of it. As PT Barnum was quoted saying - there is one born every minute....
Report this Comment
Anonymous Comment

Chris wrote on Feb 2, 2010

Also true, but that's because the team did not spend the amount of money it needed to spend on player personnel to win in the AL East. They were about 50 million dollars (or 5 really good players) short. Now they claim that they will spend the money when it is needed to "put the team over the top". (Although clearly that wasn't the case the last five or six years when the Jays really were that close to being a legitimate contender and the team imposed a hard cap of ~100mil, well behind Boston and New York.) Here's my new signature line: "You give me a payroll in the top 5 in baseball, and I'll give Toronto Blue Jays fans the postseason again." - Signed aspiring Blue Jays GM
Report this Comment
Anonymous Comment

Nic wrote on Feb 2, 2010

True Chris, but the Jays were no where close to a championship with Halladay.
Report this Comment
Anonymous Comment

Chris wrote on Jan 31, 2010

PROSPECTS DON'T WIN CHAMPIONSHIPS!
Report this Comment
Anonymous Comment

Steve wrote on Jan 30, 2010

While that's all fine and good, don't you think if Ricciardi was still at the helm that he wouldn't have been able to procure two similar Top 50 type prospects? Everyone seems ready to proclaim AA a hero for doing what any GM would have done when faced with the situation. As well, AA was part of the Ricciardi regime and had as much to do with the current state of the farm system as anyone under JP. There's no disputing that he's a very bright guy, but why does he get a free pass?
Report this Comment